The Regulatory Advocacy area keeps you informed of the latest proposed rules and regulations, their potential impact on credit unions, and provides comments to regulatory agencies to help shape regulations and lessen the compliance burden.
An interactive online tool designed to empower credit unions to participate in the regulatory process.
PowerComment allows you to:
Educate yourself on proposed rules and regulations that affect your credit union and take the opportunity to comment! Visit www.powercomment.org to get started today.
|National Credit Union Administration||EGRPRA Regulatory Review||09/02/14|
|Federal Housing Finance Agency||Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Guarantee Fees||09/08/14|
|Consumer Financial Protection Bureau||Mobile Financial Services||09/10/14|
|National Credit Union Administration||FCU Ownership of Fixed Assets||10/10/14|
|Consumer Financial Protection Bureau||Regulation of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act||10/29/14|
|L-R: Lucy Ito, EVP and COO of the California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues; Bob Arnould, SVP of Advocacy for the Leagues; Dave Gunderson, CEO of Credit Union of Southern California; Sharon Lindeman, VP of Regulatory Advocacy for the Leagues; Debbie Matz, Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration; Erin Ewart, Compliance Manager for Redwood CU; Dave Roughton, President of SAFE CU; Keith Sultemeier, CEO of Kinecta FCU; and Steve Glouberman, VP and Legal Counsel for Kinecta FCU|
The first meeting took place with NCUA Chairman Debbie Matz and other agency representatives, including Chief of Staff Steve Bosack; General Counsel Mike McKenna; Director of the Office of Examination and Insurance Larry Fazio; Senior Strategic Communications and External Relations Advisor Buddy Gill; and Executive Director Mark Treichel.
During the NCUA discussions, some of the top issues included the regulatory burden credit unions face in terms of cost, time, and resources due to the ever-changing regulatory landscape; support of a strong, yet fair, safety-and-soundness supervisory environment, as well as allowing credit unions to manage risk with appropriate autonomy; concerns surrounding a credit union service organization (CUSO) proposal that is overly restrictive; the status and concerns related to the agency's proposed derivatives rule; the need to modernize the Central Liquidity Facility; and anticipated changes to a risk- based capital structure.
The second meeting with the CFPB was held with Assistant Director for the Office of Financial Institutions and Business Liaison Dan Smith; Deputy Assistant Director for the Office of Financial Institutions and Business Liaison Elizabeth Ellis; Deposit Markets Program Manager Gary Stein; Regulations Counsel Eric Goldberg, and others.
Talks with CFPB staff focused on regulatory burdens; the bureau's international remittance transfer rule; the bureau’s concerns about overdrafts, payday loans and deposit advance products, and how credit unions serve their members in these areas; and a discussion about what credit unions can expect to see from the bureau regarding debt collection and prepaid cards.
"We are pleased with the participation and discussions from our meetings, as leaders from both the NCUA and CFPB acknowledged what we had to say," said Sharon Lindeman, vice president of regulatory advocacy. "We appreciate the leadership from both agencies making time in their schedules to meet with us and hear our concerns."
The meetings were part of a larger "Hike the Hill" gathering on Capitol Hill from Monday to Wednesday, where California and Nevada Credit Union League staff and credit union leaders met with legislators to discuss and ask for their support in preserving the credit union tax status and several regulatory relief bills.