A resource for credit unions in CA & NV, providing credit union financial and economic trend analysis, brought to you by your Leagues in partnership with CUNA & Affiliates.
Answers to your crucial questions can be less than one business day away. Post your question here, and a talented compliance professional will get back to you quickly! Or if you prefer, call the PolicyWorks compliance hotline to speak directly with our knowledgeable consultants.
Compliance Hotline: (844) 731-6072
Continue for Ask PolicyWorks
Whether the lawsuit is by an opportunistic patent holder merely seeking a quick buck (such as patent trolls) or the lawsuit is based on legitimate infringement of a patent, such lawsuits represent a significant threat to any defendant. Patent suits are, by nature, extremely expensive and time consuming.
When the focus of the patent infringement is within a product or service provided to or on behalf of a credit union by a vendor, protecting the credit union from these and other types of lawsuits often depends on a properly drafted indemnification clause.
A credit union should obtain a copy of the proposed contract at the beginning of the due diligence/negotiation process as opposed to waiting until the business terms are agreed upon. Attorneys stress that contract terms are as equally important as the business terms and should be negotiated in unison.
A credit union should also inform vendors from the onset of the negotiation process that it expects the vendor to "stand behind" its product and/or service. This means the credit union should demand indemnification from the vendor (or its agents, employees, subcontractors) not only for patent infringement, but also copyright and trademark infringement.
Furthermore, the credit union should demand indemnification against claims made by any third party which arises due to the vendor's (or its agents, employees, subcontractors) breach of the contract, negligence, and/or willful misconduct.
Elements of a Good Clause
The key to a good, properly drafted indemnification clause is to:
Limitation of Liability
Care must be taken if the contract has a limitation of liability section. Without a "carve out" for indemnification obligations, a vendor's maximum indemnification obligation would be up to the limitation negotiated.
This could leave the credit union liable to the third-party claimants for all amounts in excess of the limitation, even though the credit union had nothing to do with the issue under which the claim was made.
Therefore, limitation of liability sections are equally important to review and negotiate, as are indemnification clauses.
Recent lawsuits serve as a reminder to credit unions of the importance of having contracts reviewed by an attorney, not only for proper indemnification clauses, but to help limit credit union liability.
MLA DATABASE FEB. 15 DEADLINE
updated 02/09/16 08:00 AM
Plus, CUSO Registry Webinar
Credit unions seeking a safe harbor under the Department of Defense’s (DoD) Military Lending Act (MLA) final rule will have two new options come Oct. 3, 2016: 1) A credit union may verify a borrower’s status on the DoD’s database, or 2) a credit union may use a consumer report obtained from a nationwide consumer reporting agency to determine whether a borrower is a “covered borrower.” Credit unions interested in utilizing the first option have until Feb. 15, 2016 to notify the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) of their intent. This may be done by emailing the MLA helpdesk at firstname.lastname@example.org.
CA PRIVACY NOTICES STILL REQUIRED
updated 02/02/16 08:35 AM
Plus, Latest PolicyWorks Newsletter
The FAST Act made changes to federal annual privacy notice requirements. However, it did not change California privacy notification requirements, which are applicable to all financial institutions doing business in California. California state annual privacy notifications are still required, depending on what information is shared and with whom.